Archive

Archive for January, 2008

THE CREATURE

January 19th, 2008 6 comments

[Note: Do not be confused by the posting name below the title.  This is, indeed, another superlative column by Bob Jones, whose Internet is giving him grief at an untimely moment.] 

R.  C.  Jones

The creature had been developing for only about eight weeks, but it was
already approaching a size where it would become of concern to
government authorities.  In its dark, aqueous lair, where the
temperature was nearly 100 degrees, surviving exclusively on human
blood, its cells were multiplying at an exponential rate.  And they were
differentiating to form peculiar features that would later play a role
upon which its very life would depend. 

The creature would be covered with hair over much of its body, but
there would always be a few areas where hair would never grow.  On a
special few of these areas, the creature would soon develop protruding
growths.  A duct would extend from an opening in each growth and snake
inwardly to a gland in which a variety of chemical compounds would be
stored.  Fluid bearing these compounds would ooze from each opening. 

After about 16 more weeks, the growths would fuse together to form
sinuous structures that would enhance the grasping ability of the
creature.  Within about 12 more weeks, the creature would leave its
primal hideaway.  But its development would not stop.  It would continue
until the creature was four times its present length and more than ten
times its present weight.

It would no longer be called a fetus but would be called John Doe.  The
structures John developed are known as papillary ridges, as friction
ridges or, more commonly, as fingerprints.  The openings in them are
known as pores, and the glands, as sweat glands.  John Doe would mature
and ultimately be placed on trial for first degree murder in a
capital-punishment state.  It is at this point that his life would
depend on those little ridges.

According to many sources, fingerprints fall into four categories:
inked, plastic, patent or latent.  Inked prints are known, controlled
prints that are pressed onto what is known as a ten-card under the
supervision of a law enforcement officer or technician.  Plastic prints
are fingerprint impressions made in impressionable materials that retain
the shapes of friction ridges.  Such materials might include grease on
an automobile part, putty from a window frame, modeling clay and the
like.  Patent prints, also known as visible prints, are fingerprint
impressions formed by a transfer of some foreign matter, such as blood,
onto a surface.  Such impressions are visible and can be readily
photographed.  In the field of dactylography (the study of fingerprints
as a means of identification), latent prints are impressions, visible or
not, left by accident.  If you find the word dactylography difficult to
remember, note that it was originally named icnofalangometria.

According to an FBI publication, latent prints might be difficult to
see but can be rendered visible; and any print left at a crime scene on
almost any surface, sometimes even human skin, is referred to as a
latent print.  Such fingerprints can be made visible by such techniques
as using various colored powders to color ridge impressions so that they
contrast with the color of the surface bearing them.  Lasers and other
light sources are also used.  Another technique is glue fuming, in which
some glue vapors adhere to amino acids in a print.  I described this
process in some detail in my December essay, Lasting Impressions.  In
iodine fuming, iodine reacts with any oils and fatty deposits in latent
prints and forms an image that lasts long enough to be photographed.
Some fingerprints can also be recovered by using lifting tape, gel
lifters and flap lifters.

Speaking of the FBI, its Identification Division was created in 1924
with more than 800,000 fingerprint files, most of which were supplied by
the Levenworth Penitentiary.  The aforementioned FBI publication lists
its current number of fingerprint records at more than 250 million, and
it is increasing at a rate of 34,000 per day.  If all the fingerprint
cards were stacked, the pile would be higher than 133 Empire State
Buildings.  The print records have been computerized, and a list of
prints that closely match prints being compared can be quickly prepared
for a detailed comparison by trained technicians.

Contrary to popular thought, fingerprints are not normally oily.
Eccrine sweat glands are distributed over much of the surfaces of a
body, but they are especially abundant on the palms of hands, the soles
of feet and the forehead.  Such glands are one of four types of human
sweat glands; and they secrete a fluid containing many substances,
including acids, through pores in the fingerprint ridges but do not
secrete oils.  The fluid, or sweat, is used to control body temperature
by evaporation.

The major value of fingerprints is the fact that they are unique.  No
two prints have been found to be exactly the same, even those of
identical twins, who have the same DNA.  Also, unless they are
mechanically or chemically assaulted, most fingerprints can last for
several days, some for many years.  Plastic prints can last almost
indefinitely.  Since so many things, such as evaporation, oxidation,
absorption, dust, heat, cold, rain, humidity, cleaning, etc. can
deteriorate fingerprints, their age can usually not be determined.  Of
course, if a glass was washed two days before, prints found on it could
be assumed to have been left during those two days.

Fingerprint ridges come in three basic patterns: loops, which account
for 60-70 percent of patterns encountered, whorls, which account for
25-35 percent, and arches, which account for only about 5 percent.  Of
course, there are also subgroups.  For example, there are radial loops
that slant toward the thumb and ulnar loops that slant away from the
thumb.  The words radial and ulnar refer to bones in the forearm.  There
are plain whorls, accidental whorls, double loop whorls and central
pocket loop whirls.   There are also plain arches and tented arches,
depending on their shapes.   These terms describe specific ridge
configurations that would be difficult to describe without accompanying
illustrations.

In fingerprint analysis, there are three levels of detail.  The first
level involves general ridge flow and patterns they form.  These details
are insufficient to identify an individual but are sufficient to exclude
suspects.  Second-level analysis can identify an individual.  Depending
on which source is consulted, an average fingerprint reportedly contains
as many as 175 or even 300 individual ridge characteristics; but a
typical partial print found at a crime scene might contain only about a
fifth as many as a full print.  Second-level ridge features include a
termination, which is an end of a ridge; a bifurcation, which is formed
where one ridge splits into two ridges; a lake, which is formed where a
ridge splits and then rejoins; an independent ridge, which is a short
ridge; a point or island, which is a very short ridge; a spur, which is
formed where a short ridge leads away from another ridge for a short
distance; a crossover, which is formed where a ridge crosses from one
ridge to another; and a delta, which is formed between three joined
ridges.  Third-level detail gets really picky.  It takes note of
individual ridges’ dimensions, shapes, pores and edge configurations
and also other permanent details such as skin creases and scars. 

A common method for fingerprint  analysis involves a procedure known as
ACE-V.  It involves four steps.  Analysis is the first step, which is to
quantitatively and qualitatively assess all three levels of detail and
their ability to identify an individual.  Comparison is the second step,
which is to compare the various ridge attributes of one fingerprint
impression with another impression.  Evaluation is the third step, which
appraises the comparison to determine if there is sufficient detail to
draw a definite conclusion.  Verification is the fourth step, which
includes an independent analysis, comparison and evaluation of the ridge
impressions by another qualified examiner.

NEW TECHNOLOGY:

There is a new technique being developed for visualizing fingerprints
on metallic and electrically conductive surfaces without even touching
the print or surface.  And this can often be done after the surface has
been wiped with a tissue or heated to some 600 degrees Celsius.  Even
curved surfaces such as the surfaces of shell casings can be scanned.
The technique uses an instrument known as a scanning Kelvin probe (SKP).
 

Inorganic salts in sweat from finger ridges cause an electrochemical
reaction with a metal surface.  The reaction involves a formation of
metal-ion complexes, and these are not easy to remove.  In techno speak,
the salts depassivate the metal surface, which produces measurable
voltage differences between one point and another.  The probe measures
the voltage differences at preset intervals from small distances above
the surface.  An image of a fingerprint can then be produced by mapping
the measurements.  Resolution can be increased by simply measuring more
points in a given area, but sampling some 20 points per millimeter
provides enough detail for the purpose of identification.  Since prints
are not touched, material that might be used to obtain a DNA sample is
not disturbed.

AFTER WORD:

For those who are curious about the remaining three of the four types
of sweat glands mentioned, the second type is an apocrine gland.  These
secrete sweat containing fatty materials.  They are placed in certain
areas of a body; and bacteria breaking down organic compounds in the
sweat creates odors, thus enabling these glands to serve as scent
glands.  The third type of sweat gland is a ceruminous gland, and it
produces a type of modified sweat commonly known as ear wax.  The fourth
type of sweat gland is a mammary gland, and it produces a type of
modified sweat commonly known as milk.

A FEW EXTRA FACTS:

Callouses do not change the configuration of fingerprints.  The tough
outer layer of skin is constructed using the same cell structure as the
one below it.

John Dillinger had his fingerprints removed with acid, but his ridge
patterns reappeared.  Robert Phillips had his very fingertips surgically
replaced with skin from his chest.  Even that failed to protect him.  He
was easily identified by the ridges on the second phalanges of his
fingers.

Reportedly, a Roman attorney showed that a palm print was used to frame
someone for murder.  This took place …  nearly 2,000 years ago.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

THOMAS SULLIVAN: FIVE SENSES PLUS OR “WHAT WAS THAT YOU SAID, GOD?”

January 16th, 2008 11 comments

My first word was “Boo!” and I’ve loved surprises ever since.  I want to discover things.  Refine that, I want to discover hidden things, things that have meaning.  I want there to be more than five senses can take in.  Five senses are standard issue.  Most critters with fin, skin, fur or feathers have them, often with a superior specialty.  Jack rabbits out-hear me.  Eagles out-see me.  I’m tied with the koala bear.  But word has it that heart, mind and soul are strong suits for the human clay, and these have a type of sensory perception that respond to a whole different set of stimuli.  They feed off meanings, connections, patterns and intangible things that are bigger than life.  And mine also flourish on surprises.   So I look for that which is behind the scenes, under the surface, or “manifestly” invisible.  My physical senses pick up the obvious stuff, the bows, ribbons and colorful exteriors that gift-wrap life, but my heart, mind and soul go for what’s inside the package.  If it’s people I’m looking at, the package contains their wants and their fears, and if I can see inside the package I’ll know everything important about them – their motives, their responses, their lines in the sand.  And if it’s nature I’m looking at, the package contains the voice of the universe, whispered by stars and whatever force is behind creation.  The voice carries grandeur, excitement, meaning and truth.  I want to hear the voice of God and think about it.

Does that make me a writer?  Maybe a species of writer.  A poet.  Check that.  I still have to transmit the poetry in order to be a writer, don’t I?  And I have to find the poetry in every reader in order to be read with appreciation.  So I’m writing this to every writer who has an ounce of poetry in them (you all do) and to every reader capable of recognizing that five senses are not enough equipment to take along for a potentially incredible ride through life.

Trouble is, the world seems bent on ignoring its poetry.  Cut me some slack, please.  I’m going to bundle the words poetry, romance, ideals, heroes and perfection together for no other reason than they all seem to be in short supply in this disbelieving age.  They all sound bigger than life to me, and bigger than life is what I want to distill.  I’m talking magic, things that sing with a rhythm that transcends routine.  Natural poetry, if you will.  Trust me, it’s out there.  Or rather it’s in there.  Inside your head, your feelings, your soul.  Eye of the beholder, eye of the believer, and all that.  But shhh…please don’t let that get around.  Especially you readers.  The poets union is going to be on my case, as it is, for revealing trade secrets.  Can’t have everyone creating their own poetry willy-nilly.  Writers rule!  So if you’re not a writer, plant yourself indoors and sink your roots into the Scothguard brocade of the sofa, while you wait for bigger-than-life to magically appear on Cable and mesmerize you.  But do not – I repeat DO NOT – take things into your own hands by pulling the plug on the TV and sticking your fingers into the world’s sockets, because then you won’t need us.  Can’t have you finding out you are the finest generator of interesting content ever made.  That’s how a writer gets a leg up.  They do primary research and report to you.  And if you’re a writer, or a writer in process, bathe your senses in whatever you experience, but then take it inside your mind and dwell on it like a guru on acid.  Do not multi-task.  Transcendental yourself.  That way you may learn how to think, how to see the world, which is impossible to do in dumbed down circumstances.  So tear up the script.  Write your own.  You are unique.  Then give yourself an Emmy (Emmy, Emmy…an enema is what you get when you visit the marketplace – whole other essay).

Writer or reader, most people suffer from a contagious disease called “passivity,” characterized by a lack of imagination.  It’s generally harmless, except for lost living time – sort of like sleeping on the job.  But if you’re a writer, it’s downright lethal.  Some people are born with an immunity, or a hyper-gene for imagination, but everyone has some natural resistance to passivity.  If you’ve lost yours, the best way to reacquire it is to concentrate without distraction until you can make walls collapse and to stay away from voluntarily boring people.  You can tell if people are voluntarily boring because they will say they are themselves bored or otherwise surrender initiative.  The second best way to get in touch with your imagination is to connect yourself with reservoirs of inspiration.  That can be a place, an activity, or a person.  In my case, my mentor was a tree.

I first met Evergreen as I was skiing around a turn.  It wasn’t just the front-row seat he had taken to hang out on the corner that drew my attention, but rather his infirmity.  He was missing his lowest overhanging boughs.  Moreover, they had obviously been lopped off.  I stopped.  “Ouch, I bet that hurt,” I said.  He said nothing, conveying the impression of wisdom; and the fact that the rest of him was throbbingly green and thriving suggested strength of character.  We talked.  Or rather he listened, which confirmed the impression of stately wisdom.  “Aren’t you bored just standing here?” I blathered.  But he answered naughtCould be autistic, crossed my mind.  I decided to give him a test.  “When you see a cloud, do you just see…a cloud?”  Naught squared.  A genius!  Of course he saw more than a cloud.  How could he not?  Standing there, seeing every cloud of every sky of every day in his corner of the universe?  He was too wise to answer, that’s all.  How could you stare at the cosmos 24/7, non-stop naked infinity, as the moon and the sun trade numberless shifts, and life and death play out before you, leaving telltale tracks in the snow or trails in the grass as the seasons come and go, observing mating, hunting, the answering of territorial imperatives through droughts and times of plenty, storms and Halcyon days, witnessing miracles in the light of day and dark magic in the night, and not learn all there is to learn?  And you know, there has never been a time since, when I have passed that tree, that I have not felt an amazing thought or emotion.  So Evergreen has become my reservoir of inspiration.   I do not know if he is religious, but then he surely knows more of God than any religion trapped behind four walls within the petty politics and shifting moralities of civilization.  So I usually murmur a nondenominational, “May our prayers be granted, tree,” as I pass by.  And Evergreen rewards me by saying naught.

But I digress.  I was lamenting that the world seems bent on ignoring its poetry.  I can propound a dozen reasons for this, though at bottom I think it’s a throwback to a 19th century conflict.  The Virgin and the Dynamo met head on during the Industrial Revolution, and the Virgin lost everything but her virginity.  It was an age when spiritual values collided with the razzmatazz of mechanized ways of doing things.  Up reared the factories, pulling an agrarian world into the future.  No, I’m not ranting about pollution or globalization.  But in an increasingly pre- packaged world where needs were met and delivered by third parties, people were beginning to lose their connections with the natural world, with self-reliance and their own inner resources.  Hard to be philosophical in a large and meaningful way when you are shrinking into a complex mega-society where everyone and everything is specialized.  The John Stuart Mill classical education went by the boards, and broadly learned generalists became an endangered species.  And that was just the beginning.  We saw a resurgence of humanism here and there in the 20th century, but technology (and I love it) advanced as Toffler said it would in FUTURE SHOCK.  Too much information spread over too many fields to be assimilated and put into perspective.  So the push was toward becoming a cog in the great machine of humanity and knowing little of how the other cogs work.  Jay Leno’s JayWalks and Glenn Beck’s Moron Trivia reveal a frightening vacuum between the ears of those poised to inherit the Earth.  But you really only needed to listen to the media’s talking heads over the past 30 years since they anointed themselves in trios and quartets on raised daises to find the same appalling ignorance and lack of context.  And that increasingly activist media is the surrogate parent, educator and peer representative for us all.  So it’s very hard to be independent these days, very hard to rely on your own imagination and develop an informed and encompassing view of life.  Much easier to just have it fed you according to your time and place and circumstances.  And if you can’t get beneath the conditioning and indoctrination of our times, you are to a greater degree derivative.  BUT…if you are or want to become one of those rare people who still know where the primary sources are, and you can fight your way out of the sheltering cocoon that comes pretty much automatically with modern living, you just might become an original.  Seems to me a writer must do this, if they want something to say.  And finding the poetry in life is a good place to start, because it is almost synonymous with those words I cited earlier: romance, ideals, heroes and perfection – all casualties of a jaded, more cynical world that came with the savvy of a fast-transit, mass communication, pc-connected, hi-tech, dynamo-wins-over-virgin age.  But can you understand a jaded world without having a vision for a perfect one?  Don’t negative things imply the existence of positives?  There is no night without day, no pain without pleasure, no death without life.  I want to go where the light and warmth are.  I want to live and write where beauty and wisdom remind me of that, even if I show it by reversing it in a dark mirror.  Five senses are good for digesting fast food and taking in life’s re-runs.  Heart, mind and soul can make truth dance and awaken sleeping dreams.  Let me discover and relay the surprises.  And if the world won’t give me that, I’ll find the poetry within myself and plant it wherever I go.  Johnny Appleseed would understand.   

Thanks for reading. Your thoughts are welcome, your attention valued.  If you’d like to see more of my writing, please check out a free sample chapter from THE WATER WOLF on my website.  My free monthly newsletter is separate from this column and the mailing list is growing by leaps and bounds.  I’ll be happy to send it to you if you email me at: mn333mn@earthlink.net   Older newsletters are now being added to the website (www.thomassullivanauthor.com) but unfortunately we can only include new photos with the e-mailed version.  You can also get to my past columns right there with the newsletter on my web page under News & Articles, or if you want to go month by month to the 16th in the SU archives, they are available that way as well.

Thomas “Sully” Sullivan
http://www.thomassullivanauthor.com/

Read more…