Thomas Sullivan: A RED SHIRT, MOLASSES IN A FEATHERED WORLD, & THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WALL
“Don’t worry. I forgot your name too.” That’s what my red T-shirt proclaims. I don’t wear it to be funny. I wear it out of fear. Names zip into and out of my ears like grease through a goose. I’m dense as a box of rocks when it comes to retaining that most basic of labels. Given that I’ve mingled in mobs most of my life, this is a major problem. I use the term “mobs” lovingly – referring to coaching, teaching, a stint as city commissioner, writing & public speaking, and just generally rolling along like a drop of misplaced molasses in a feathered world. Used to beat up on myself over my inability to remember names. Sheer arrogance, I thought. Which is what the nameless victims of my selective amnesia had a right to feel about me. But I’ve come to believe it is anything but arrogance. Moreover, I think it underlies a critical author skill.
Mmm. Skill. Maybe that’s wishful thinking. Okay, an author focus. But critical. Definitely that. Because the reason I don’t catch names is that I am intensely focused on whatever is coming at me below the verbal level. When I first meet someone my attention is like an iceberg, 7/8ths beneath the surface of what they are saying. I will notice minute psychological details, mannerisms, gestures, expressions, verbal clues behind spoken words — tone, repetitions, hesitations, any pattern — the choices the person makes as indicated by their appearance, where their attention drifts, their responses, fears, wants, ad infinitum. I am overwhelmed with information to process. But I am unlikely to remember their name. Whether I do the below-ground noticing with any particular insight, or even accurately, does not really matter, I suppose, as far as being an author. The relevant thing is that I am engaged in perceiving people, and whether I’m spot-on in what I see or simply inventing stuff it all goes into the bit bucket of my imagination and mental filing cabinet for new characters.
It does matter, however, that I do this without being threatening or judgmental. After all, if I’m going to learn anything, I need to be trusted and accepted as capable of understanding. Moreover, what I personally want is to know truth. In human relations it is very hard not to unconsciously cue people as to what you want or expect. And so we end up with anything but truth, namely lip service, false testimonials, and illusions presented to us by those with whom we interact. The deepest human passions and the darkest secrets reveal themselves best when they come at you without being bidden in any way. Create an expectation for them and you will likely get what you wanted rather than truth. So dialing back on your persuasiveness and repressing your subtle expectations as best you can makes learning truths possible. Authors need to have that objective mode, if only so they can give back truth in their writings.
Permit me to double down here. Last month I received a large amount of e-mail pertaining to that column about my stay in a Dominican slum (http://storytellersunplugged.com/thomassullivan/2010/07/16/thomas-sullivan-skinny-dogs-skinny-chickens-skinny-people-or-how-to-blow-the-cap-on-your-own-deep-water-well-and-free-your-imagination/ ). I promised to follow through with more info about that, and I’ll do it here by way of illustrating the above points – it was a time of truth-gathering for me.
Poverty wracked Villa Esfuerzo, where people may sit ankle-deep in water in their one-room shotgun shacks as slashing rains come through, has its outposts of security behind razor wire and iron bars. There was a wall and iron bars around where we slept. Beyond the wall roosters crowed all night and local children gathered in silent packs to watch us through the bars as we talked of profound things or sang the evenings away. This mute audience bothered me greatly. Children shout, children move and make noise, children laugh. Not these. They stood barefoot in their worn shirts and shorts and watched and watched and watched in total stillness as we moved and laughed. They stood as if they were watching an irresistible movie. It haunted me. It still haunts me. The first time I saw them I was reminded of a home-made movie I saw years ago taken of some stone-age hunters in Borneo who had never visited civilization but were taken to a modern airport where they stood in silence outside a chain link fence watching giant airplanes land and take-off. During WWII these same hunters had aided marines who had come in planes and given them chocolate. When the war ended the natives built a crude narrow runway and erected a model plane lure and lit the sides of the runway with torches at night while they watched the skies for a return. They watched and waited for decades. And here they stood in their feathered finery and fierce face paint, looking very small before the soaring airliners on the other side of the chain link. What were they thinking? What did these children here now in the Dominican think?
Every night that they came I went to the iron bars and in broken Spanish tried to talk to them. I asked them their names. And, of course, I don’t remember any of them. Well…one. I remember one. Juanita. All the same I was searching for answers, for clues as to what they felt and how they would remember our presence in their world and what that might tell them about the rest of the planet. My concentration was as fierce as the Borneo hunters’ faces, but I could glean nothing. Nada. They watched expressionlessly through the bars or smiled shyly when I talked to them — the older boys hanging back a little warily — and that was it. Not a clue. They came each night by climbing a second stone wall into a kind of garden that I had jokingly dubbed “the tarantula badlands” because we had hunted down the giant hairy spiders there one night. They seemed so transitory – these watchers. Impossible in eternity. I wanted to open those gates and bring them in. Did they sense that? Have they forgiven me for not finding a way to include them? Ah, vanity. I want to be forgiven. That’s the kind of liberal guilt I can’t stand. Love is what you give, not what you get.
Lots more to tell, but no space to tell it. Well. Actually I’ve been saying it a lot lately face to face with people. So, I’ll tell you what. If there’s enough interest in this, as there was last month, I’ll go one more column with something else from the Dominican adventure. Maybe that’s how I’ll take some of the bars down and exorcise my vanity of conscience.
There are new photos from the DR adventure in the August Sullygram (newsletter) being released today — e-mail me at mn333mn@earthlink.net and I’ll send it to you along with July’s Dominican photos. You’ll also find archived copies of Sullygams w/pictures on my author’s web site, though the latest one is always slightly delayed so that it can include a Permalink to this column.
May I also invite you to follow me on Twitter? Sample of recent Tweets: “Kill your so-called foolish dreams and you become the person everyone expected you to be.” …and “I wish I didn’t know all the things that have been lost or thrown away, and I wish I could forget the time wasted in the wrong life.” Your thoughts are welcome, your attention valued.
Thomas “Sully” Sullivan

Your thoughts about those children are very haunting. I remember reading once, that some journalist visiting Russia and doing a story, asked a group of children what their dreams were, for their future. He was told…”they have no dreams, for they have no future.” They did not even know the concept of a dream. What could be more sad. Being an abused child, I used to dream of being taken away by some heroic figure–I think it was a cowboy. I do not believe I could have survived if I had not been able to dream of something better to come.
I wonder if the little children you saw staring at all of you, were “dreamless” too, like the Russian children. They deserve something better.–a chance to dream and, someday, a better reality.
Very much appreciate your candor, Dorie, and you’ve nailed it. Dreams are entry level for survival. And dreams are alive if not well in Villa Esfuerzo, I believe. The hollow-eyed look of an adolescent struggling to survive notwithstanding, the children are quick to respond. Hope is a communicable emotion, but it takes courage and initiative. That much is required of all of us if we are to fulfill our potential. Beyond that, life is circumstance. I do believe it takes very little to be happy and that it has little to do with materialism. Basics, sure, but I almost think that people in comfortable circumstances are less apt to find out the things that count or how to max out their lives. Those kids on the other side of the wall got a glimpse into both worlds, and I wanted dearly to somehow explain the differences so that they would understand the sameness.
– Sully
Hi Sully,
I’m writing to you from Ireland. Just vacationing and researching with a starving artist daughter. You touch a core epiphany about happiness. Experience in “not having” helps you appreciate “having.” Then there’s some who are responsible enough to let go of “having” and show the “not having” it is not “all.” Hope and dreams are passed in a smile or even in arrogance when it begets desire to dream. And so well said, “Dreams are entry level for survival.”
Dream on,
Anne
“Ireland…starving artist” — now why does that smack nostalgic to a writer named Sullivan? Exquisite observations on a thread I was hoping wasn’t too counter-intuitive to be understood, Anne. Thanks for adding some color from your insightful palette. Not having>happiness has me humming “…freedom’s just another word for nothin’ left to lose,” from Janis Joplin’s “Bobby McGee” this morning. Friend told me the other day that she died before the song became a monster hit. Tough way to stay free, presumably happy, by not having the success that followed, but I guess she walked the walk on that one, becoming Bobby McGee herself. Enjoy the Emerald Isle and say hello to “the little people” in Connemara for me.
– Sully
More please, and did you go outside to sit with them?
Lots of email coming in, so I think the interest justifies another Dominican visit next month, thank you very much.
Ah, going into the Tarantula badlands was more a problem of red tape than iron bars. The gate was only opened once, and that took a half hour of chasing people around for permissions and keys. On that occasion the ony locals I saw were a couple of older boys who fled over a wall at the far end. We were hunting tarantulas and I think our flashlights made them think they were being sought out. Lots of opportunities to interact and talk with local kids at the work site and in Villa Esfuerzo, of course. It was just this one particular group of kids where we slept that remained inaccessible except through the bars of the sliding gate. I understood the need for security. All our gear was under security, and unfortunately crime is high in the area. Razor wire everywhere throughout the slums in and above Santo Domingo.
– Sully
Sully–Interesting point on why you’re bad with names. People usually assume it’s arrogance, but they should not be so quick to jump to conclusions. I take in a lot of the sub-verbal, too, and yet manage to catch the name; but I think the difference is that the sub-verbal I’m gathering is a vibe (for my personal use) and you’re gathering data (for your professional use). Wonder if that would change if I took the leap into fiction?
Your description of the children who “had no dreams” was as saddening as it was touching and left me with a feeling of empathetic emptiness as your words illustrated the emptiness of their reality.
You once commented about a friend’s first unplug piece by writing that “the depth of your soul is showing, my humble friend, and I, as always, am humbled by it.” That certainly applies to your present piece.
And, of course, you left readers with words to live by with “Kill your so-called foolish dreams and you become the person everyone expected you to be.”
Since you referred in your piece to a cargo cult, you might be interested to know that one still exists on the island of Tanna, Vanuatu.
Amalgam
Hmmm. Dunno. And you’ve made a thought-provoking distinction, Jeani. However, in my case, I don’t think there is a separation between personal and professional use. I don’t regard my modes and behaviors as stemming from “professionalism.” Yes, I try to present themes about professionalism so that writers and people interested in writing can come to SU and find same, but I’m not consciously oriented that way inside my own reflexes. Most of what I do is just who I am. Guess I’d like to think that makes me a born writer. Uh-oh. If I take away your finely parsed distinction, where does that leave me in regard to not remembering names? Aaargh! I really am arrogant…
Ah, Amalgam aka Bob Jones, leave it to you to trace down the origin of my phantom memory regarding the cargo cult. I think Jack Paar did a piece on it originally. You are the definitive word on so many things, sir.
Glad my Twitter sample (tweet) resonated. Contrary to my expectation, I’ve found Twitter to be fun, especially if I can post something meaningful or witty once in a while. For me dreams are a part of reality. I don’t see how a person can be faithful to one and not the other, i.e. to reality and not to dreams. Isn’t that called pretending? Sort of like the moral of The Emperor’s New Clothes. Just going through the motions and lip service is scarcely closer to reality than what you believe/wish/dream inside your head. Until the two — dreams and reality — mesh is there any course open to a person except to try to make them mesh? Outward appearances are never a convincing reality to me. I want to know what a person wants and feels and wishes were true.
And we must give credit to Dorie (from Colorado) who supplied the rending picture of “children who had no dreams. I believe I read something about that just the way she sourced it.
Thanks for the context, Amgalgam…
– Sully
Sully, your mention of the locked gates and the pictures of the children peering through reminded me of a rather sad irony I encountered in South America. The poorest people lived in shacks up in the hills, and the wealthy lived in the city, imprisoned in their gated mansions, afraid to venture out very far or very much due to the high crime. In this country, at least in my Colorado, the wealthy live in the hills and the mountains and the poor live in squalor or with meager belongings and sustenance in the inner cities. I think I almost felt more sorry for the rich, who didn’t dare to leave their coveted , guarded piece of earth,while the poor, at least, had the freedom to walk among the wildflowers and smell the fresh air and since they had no material wealth, did not have the worry that someone would take it away from them. Observing life gives us a lot to ponder, doesn’t it?
Another irony that I’ve never thought about, Dorie, and an excellent point. I’ve lived in a dozen South American countries, many of which — Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Venezuela, Uruguay, Paraguay — had just those geo-class separations you’ve described, and I’ve lived in places like St. Thomas in The caribbean where it is reversed. Thanks for the thought-provoking examples. I’d definitely prefer the Pandora-like freedom of open air and natural surroundings to the pressing confines of a city, whatever my economic circumstances.
– Sully
Hey, Sully. Your talk on the DR makes me believe you should be a correspondent with Vanguard, which you can find on CurrentTV. In regards to the red shirt, I have one as well (though I never wear it) which proclaims That’s MISTER F@&#head To You! But, yea, I get it. I’ve tried very hard to associate new friends–Christ help me when I meet more than two at a time–because I’m bogged down in the, OK, if he/she were a character in a story…this happens at the readings here in Chicago, thankfully, many of the writers have business cards. i also blame forgetfulness on the fact that I turn 97 in a few weeks.
97? A mere callow lad. Age is what happens when you’re resting.
Thanks again for sharing Sullie. Looking forward to seeing you on Sunday. Also looking forward to hearing more about your DR experience. I’m wondering if or where you saw God in the DR. Pretty wild question that can go a lot of different directions. G+P2U dave
Where does one look to NOT see evidence of creation? The sheer counterintuitive overtness of the universe has always slammed me in the face, and I view that as deliberate creation. It just should not be. But it is. The natural order should be nothingness. But it isn’t. So, I’m always overwhelmed by impressions and awestruck when I travel to somewhere as starkly textured as the Dominican. More specifically, yeah, soul-touching moments abounded in ways that transcended 5 senses. Hugging a frail old lady while a three-year-old clung to my leg seemed to bridge time and space; feeling the palpable emotion of songs in a church; and eyes…so many eyes luminous with passion for which I cannot find words. Those were moments right out of the cosmos – my proof of an Uber presence, a wizard divine, God by any name.
Thanks for commenting here again, Dave. Am going to work a food bank with Norby Nation before the Open House, but will see you and Ruben afterward…
– Sully
…rolling along like a drop of misplaced molasses in a feathered world.
What a wonderful way to be. In my opinion, names, more often than not, are the least important thing about a person. When I meet someone new, I observe them just exactly as you described. This means that I sometimes miss their name. I never forget a face though. I can be standing in line behind a stranger at Target and see them three weeks later at Open House and know them instantly. I can probably tell you something slightly intimate about them too, at least in some cases. Maybe they need glasses but aren’t wearing any, or maybe they have a charm on their keychain that reads WORLD’S BEST SISTER. Maybe they were buying Depends. We would have been great Fortunetellers, you and I. You learn a lot when you see in details. As writers, I suppose we are Fortunetellers, of a sort, eh?
Your Dominican memories this month make me think of The Gods Must be Crazy or Lost Boys of Sudan. I can only reference movies, you see, for those sorts of details that live behind your eyes are ones I cannot fully fathom for myself. I am grateful to storytellers (and fortunetellers) like you who are able to share what they have experienced so eloquently.
Oh, tell my fortune, tell my fortune…PLEASE!
Well, methinks you are right, as usual. Fortune-telling and writing are kissing cousins. But this here gypsy does not have your talent for remembering faces. I’m hard pressed to excuse myself on that score, but I think it has something to do with the fact that I relate faces to each other, sort of like going through a mug shot book. The first things I tend to notice are similarities, and therein lies the subsequent confusion for me. Also context will throw me. Again patterns, similarities. I mistake one face for another. As soon as something psychological enters the “picture,” though, my mind opens like a filing cabinet drawer (empty?) and info floods out.
Your kind comments put a shine on my day, thank you very much. And I think you’re spot on about this meeting place called StorytellersUnplugged. It’s a really great synthesis of things you can’t find elsewhere. And I’m most grateful for the intriguing glimpses into other minds — glimpses into yours being right up there at the top.
– Sully