Thomas Sullivan: BREAST-FED BRAINS vs. NOITANIGAMI
Think back. Way back. Lying-in-your-bassinet back. What kind of formula were you raised on? No-no…I don’t mean breast milk/formula. I mean how was your life orchestrated? Dr. Spock baby? Schedules/organization/chaos/mommy-was-on-Valium? Meat and potatoes lifestyle? (Dunno…I’ve repressed all that)? The answer is very important to your imagination and creativity. No question, creativity can either be given wings or pushed off a cliff while we are still in the cradle – creatle.
True, hardwiring is major. By nature a few of us will never find our way out of the box, and a few others will never find their way into the box; but there’s enough spark of imagination in most of us to escape becoming a zombie spectator to life, if that spark gets kindled early-on. Whether or not that nurturing takes place in a meaningful way may be largely circumstantial. Example:
You are six again…your older sister has taken you to the Roxy theater for a double feature, and you come in two-thirds of the way through the first flick where the plot (and character relationships) has already thickened, as they say. If this isn’t the way you usually see movies, you will probably be overwhelmed, frustrated or bored by an inscrutable story. But if that’s just the way you go to shows – spectator interruptus – then over time you may simply learn to fill in the blanks and connect dots in order to make sense of the films. During that process you’ll need to recognize probabilities in the twists, and patterns in the relationships, and how to reach beyond into possibilities. Some of that will just be predicting things and events, but understanding character relationships and motivations will play large. Did the couple date/mate/hate? Is Lucille trying to marry/bury Hugo? You get good at it after a while. And whenever you’re surprised by a new character revelation or a plot twist, you learn, you grow.
A generation ago that kind of fragmented assimilating was early training for recognizing and understanding patterns and possibilities. You seldom got to hear complete radio shows or saw movies starting from the beginning, owing to the fact that the former were usually heard in short car trips and the latter was the way kids went to theaters – just dropping in, not waiting for a starting time. The result was learning to make inferences, exploiting all the possibilities gleaned from experience, and going beyond into the realm of creativity. It was the beginning of playing “What if…?” But radio as a story medium is largely gone now, and visual media is so comprehensive that there are fewer dots to connect. Imagination, alas, has been spoon fed into dormancy in the average person.
As a writer –and former teacher – I think I’m describing a pretty major generational change here. In short order we’ve evolved from think-on-demand lifestyles through prefabbed consumerism into a world of intense media that seductively offers to relieve us of our last outpost of independent thinking if not individualism itself. Even the process of producing that media has become digitally packaged to play out variables with less need for organic imagination. Need a plot, a character, a story arc? Plenty of apps out there to help you along in whatever medium you are working. Or in almost every other phase of life and labor, for that matter. It’s number painting for the mind. You see the problem here? We need some imagination about our imaginations.
Of course, you don’t have to sign onto passiveness and there will always be mavericks who do not. Is surrendering evermore to the alluring orchestrations of life a moral question? What’s wrong with enjoying the ride, a life of ease and input from outside sources? Well, nothing in an instant gratification and emotive culture; but being dumbed out of the management of existence other than to feel in a world that increasingly offers to take care of you from cradle to crypt has its price. Hello, Big Brother. And if you don’t particularly want to have another sib, big or otherwise, if you bristle at the idea of being kept, if you want to preserve and enhance your native skills and self-reliance, there are ways of doing that. Because the good news is that if you can’t teach creativity, you can still train it. Anyone who enjoys thinking can use the kind of sampling approach I described above to strengthen their grasp of the world around them. But it is always easier to feel than to think. Easier still to make them mutually exclusive and just go with instant gratification and an emotive reflex to the life around us. So, at first, it may require a conscious effort to look for the dots in life that need connecting in a purely analytical way. They’re still there, however. In nature. In prima facie life. Peek through a keyhole, put a cup to the wall, follow some footprints in the snow, or just go stand in nature until “you get it.” Practice extrapolating and interpreting full scenes from scraps and vignettes. It may be as much a matter of NOT joining the masses in the grandstands of life as it is finding your own way. At least that’s a start.
Yeah, I know, sounds silly. Sounds Orwellian or Huxleyistic or some other dire apocalyptic warning done in flashing crimson neon about society going to hell in a basket. But really, evolutionary changes are not revolutionary. They are slow, sometimes insidious. If something restless inside you sparks with recognition as you read this, then maybe you’re a candidate for escaping group-think, for living more freely and independently, for resisting the wave of media-driven usurpation. Maybe you’re an – oh, I don’t know – A WRITER! Leave the crowd behind and you’ll be on your way to something. I don’t have a clue as to what. I mean, this isn’t a formula, is it? That would be going back to breast and bottle. You’re on your own now. IMAGINE that…
Thomas “Sully” Sullivan
http://www.thomassullivanauthor.com












